Communication IEP goals

Expressive and receptive language, articulation carry-over, AAC use and conversation, written for the classroom half of a student’s day.

Speech and language goals are written by the SLP on the team. These are classroom-facing versions a teacher can bring to the meeting — not a substitute for the SLP’s own targets, and not a diagnostic tool.

Write a communication goal

Runs in your browser · nothing is sent anywhere · no student information

Annual goal

By the annual review date, when [Student] wants an item or activity that is out of reach, they will request it using words, signs or their communication system in 8 of 10 opportunities, as measured by a request tally kept by classroom staff.

Benchmarks

  1. 1

    By the annual review date, when [Student] wants an item or activity that is out of reach, they will request it using words, signs or their communication system in 3 of 10 opportunities, as measured by a request tally kept by classroom staff.

  2. 2

    By the annual review date, when [Student] wants an item or activity that is out of reach, they will request it using words, signs or their communication system in 5 of 10 opportunities, as measured by a request tally kept by classroom staff.

  3. 3

    By the annual review date, when [Student] wants an item or activity that is out of reach, they will request it using words, signs or their communication system in 6 of 10 opportunities, as measured by a request tally kept by classroom staff.

Replace [Student] and any remaining bracket in your own document. The IEP team writes the goal from this student's present levels; this is a starting draft, not an IEP.

23 communication goals

Each shown at an example present level and target.

Requesting

· opportunities met

By the annual review date, when [Student] wants an item or activity that is out of reach, they will request it using words, signs or their communication system in 8 of 10 opportunities, as measured by a request tally kept by classroom staff.

Grades PreK, K–2
Other ways to measure this
  • a request tally kept by classroom staff
  • daily communication data sheets

Answering questions

· percent accuracy

By the annual review date, when asked a direct question about a familiar topic, [Student] will answer with a relevant response with 85% accuracy, as measured by weekly language probes recorded on a data sheet.

Grades PreK, K–2, 3-5
Other ways to measure this
  • weekly language probes recorded on a data sheet
  • structured observation records kept during lessons

Following oral directions

· percent accuracy

By the annual review date, when given a two-step oral direction, [Student] will carry out both steps in order with 88% accuracy, as measured by weekly direction-following probes.

Grades PreK, K–2, 3-5
Other ways to measure this
  • weekly direction-following probes
  • daily observation records kept by staff

Using their AAC system

· fading prompts

By the annual review date, during structured activities, [Student] will use their communication system to comment or request with no adult prompting, as measured by a prompting-level data sheet kept during activities.

Grades PreK, K–2, 3-5, 6-8
Other ways to measure this
  • a prompting-level data sheet kept during activities
  • daily communication records

Sentence length in speech

· a running total

By the annual review date, when describing a picture or event, [Student] will speak in utterances averaging 6 words per utterance, as measured by language samples collected and analysed monthly.

Grades PreK, K–2
Other ways to measure this
  • language samples collected and analysed monthly
  • weekly structured description tasks recorded on a data sheet

Articulation carry-over in class

· percent accuracy

By the annual review date, during classroom conversation, [Student] will produce their target sound correctly in words with 85% accuracy, as measured by classroom speech samples scored by staff.

Grades K–2, 3-5
Other ways to measure this
  • classroom speech samples scored by staff
  • weekly carry-over data sheets shared with the speech-language pathologist

Vocabulary for classroom needs

· opportunities met

By the annual review date, when [Student] needs help, a break or a material, they will say or show which one using their communication system in 8 of 10 opportunities, as measured by a communication tally kept by staff.

Grades PreK, K–2, 3-5
Other ways to measure this
  • a communication tally kept by staff
  • daily data sheets recording requests by type

Describing and explaining

· a running total

By the annual review date, when asked to describe an object, event or process, [Student] will give 5 relevant details in a logical order, as measured by weekly description tasks scored against a checklist.

Grades 3-5, 6-8
Other ways to measure this
  • weekly description tasks scored against a checklist
  • language samples reviewed monthly

Retelling an event

· percent accuracy

By the annual review date, when asked what happened during an activity, [Student] will retell it in order including who, what and where, with 85% accuracy against a scoring guide, as measured by weekly retell tasks scored against a guide.

Grades K–2, 3-5
Other ways to measure this
  • weekly retell tasks scored against a guide
  • structured observation records

Conversational turn taking

· a running total

By the annual review date, in a conversation with a peer, [Student] will take 6 exchanges on the same topic, responding to what the peer said, as measured by turn counts recorded during structured social time.

Grades 3-5, 6-8, 9-12
Other ways to measure this
  • turn counts recorded during structured social time
  • weekly conversation samples scored by staff

Repairing a breakdown

· opportunities met

By the annual review date, when a listener does not understand, [Student] will repeat or rephrase the message rather than giving up, in 4 of 5 opportunities, as measured by observation records kept during conversation.

Grades 3-5, 6-8
Other ways to measure this
  • observation records kept during conversation
  • weekly communication data sheets

Speaking in front of the class

· opportunities met

By the annual review date, during class discussion, [Student] will contribute a relevant comment or question in 4 of 5 lessons, as measured by a participation tally kept during discussion.

Grades 3-5, 6-8, 9-12
Other ways to measure this
  • a participation tally kept during discussion
  • weekly observation records

Understanding wh- questions

· percent accuracy

By the annual review date, when asked who, what, where, when and why questions about a familiar activity, [Student] will answer the question that was asked with 88% accuracy, as measured by weekly question probes scored with a key.

Grades PreK, K–2, 3-5
Other ways to measure this
  • weekly question probes scored with a key
  • structured language tasks recorded on a data sheet

Grammar in spoken language

· percent accuracy

By the annual review date, in spoken sentences, [Student] will use the target grammatical form — plurals, past tense, or pronouns — correctly with 85% accuracy, as measured by language samples analysed for the target form.

Grades K–2, 3-5
Other ways to measure this
  • language samples analysed for the target form
  • weekly structured elicitation tasks recorded on a data sheet

Listening comprehension in class

· percent accuracy

By the annual review date, after a spoken lesson segment, [Student] will answer questions about what was said with 85% accuracy, as measured by weekly listening comprehension checks scored with a key.

Grades 3-5, 6-8
Other ways to measure this
  • weekly listening comprehension checks scored with a key
  • lesson-embedded question sets recorded on a data sheet

Volume and rate

· opportunities met

By the annual review date, when speaking to a group, [Student] will use a volume and pace an audience at the back can follow, in 4 of 5 observed opportunities, as measured by observation records scored against a speaking checklist.

Grades 3-5, 6-8, 9-12
Other ways to measure this
  • observation records scored against a speaking checklist
  • recorded presentations reviewed by staff

Giving instructions to someone else

· percent accuracy

By the annual review date, when asked to explain how to do something, [Student] will give the steps in order so a listener can follow them, scoring 85% against a step checklist, as measured by weekly explanation tasks scored against a checklist.

Grades 3-5, 6-8
Other ways to measure this
  • weekly explanation tasks scored against a checklist
  • structured observation records

Choosing a communication partner

· opportunities met

By the annual review date, when [Student] has something to share, they will get the listener’s attention before speaking in 8 of 10 opportunities, as measured by a communication tally kept by staff.

Grades K–2, 3-5
Other ways to measure this
  • a communication tally kept by staff
  • daily observation records

Understanding figurative and indirect language

· percent accuracy

By the annual review date, when a speaker uses an idiom, a hint or sarcasm, [Student] will state what was actually meant with 80% accuracy, as measured by weekly scenario probes scored against a guide.

Grades 6-8, 9-12
Other ways to measure this
  • weekly scenario probes scored against a guide
  • structured social language tasks recorded on a data sheet

Presenting to a group

· percent accuracy

By the annual review date, when giving a short prepared presentation, [Student] will cover all required content points, scoring 85% or higher on the class presentation rubric, as measured by the class presentation rubric applied by the teacher.

Grades 6-8, 9-12
Other ways to measure this
  • the class presentation rubric applied by the teacher
  • recorded presentations scored against the same rubric

Interview and workplace communication

· percent accuracy

By the annual review date, in a practice interview or workplace exchange, [Student] will greet the person, answer questions in complete sentences and close the conversation, scoring 88% on a communication checklist, as measured by practice interviews scored against a checklist.

Grades 9-12, transition
Other ways to measure this
  • practice interviews scored against a checklist
  • job coach observation records

Communicating discomfort or pain

· opportunities met

By the annual review date, when [Student] feels unwell or uncomfortable, they will tell an adult using words, signs or their communication system in 4 of 5 observed opportunities, as measured by staff records of reported discomfort.

Grades PreK, K–2, 3-5, transition
Other ways to measure this
  • staff records of reported discomfort
  • daily communication data sheets

Generalising communication across settings

· opportunities met

By the annual review date, [Student] will use their target communication skill with at least two different adults and in at least two settings, in 4 of 5 observed opportunities, as measured by data sheets kept by staff in each setting.

Grades K–2, 3-5, 6-8
Other ways to measure this
  • data sheets kept by staff in each setting
  • weekly generalisation probes recorded across settings

Other skill areas

The five parts of a measurable goal

Sources

Every figure on this page comes from one of the documents below, with the date it was read. Requirements change; if a source has moved on since that date, the source is right and this page is out of date.