Expressive and receptive language, articulation carry-over, AAC use and conversation, written for the classroom half of a student’s day.
Speech and language goals are written by the SLP on the team. These are classroom-facing versions a teacher can bring to the meeting — not a substitute for the SLP’s own targets, and not a diagnostic tool.
Write a communication goal
Runs in your browser · nothing is sent anywhere · no student information
Annual goal
By the annual review date, when [Student] wants an item or activity that is out of reach, they will request it using words, signs or their communication system in 8 of 10 opportunities, as measured by a request tally kept by classroom staff.
Benchmarks
1
By the annual review date, when [Student] wants an item or activity that is out of reach, they will request it using words, signs or their communication system in 3 of 10 opportunities, as measured by a request tally kept by classroom staff.
2
By the annual review date, when [Student] wants an item or activity that is out of reach, they will request it using words, signs or their communication system in 5 of 10 opportunities, as measured by a request tally kept by classroom staff.
3
By the annual review date, when [Student] wants an item or activity that is out of reach, they will request it using words, signs or their communication system in 6 of 10 opportunities, as measured by a request tally kept by classroom staff.
Replace [Student] and any remaining bracket in your own document.
The IEP team writes the goal from this student's present levels; this is a starting draft,
not an IEP.
23
communication goals
Each shown at an example present level and target.
Requesting
·opportunities met
By the annual review date, when [Student] wants an item or activity that is out of reach, they will request it using words, signs or their communication system in 8 of 10 opportunities, as measured by a request tally kept by classroom staff.
Grades PreK, K–2
Other ways to measure this
—a request tally kept by classroom staff
—daily communication data sheets
Answering questions
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, when asked a direct question about a familiar topic, [Student] will answer with a relevant response with 85% accuracy, as measured by weekly language probes recorded on a data sheet.
Grades PreK, K–2, 3-5
Other ways to measure this
—weekly language probes recorded on a data sheet
—structured observation records kept during lessons
Following oral directions
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, when given a two-step oral direction, [Student] will carry out both steps in order with 88% accuracy, as measured by weekly direction-following probes.
Grades PreK, K–2, 3-5
Other ways to measure this
—weekly direction-following probes
—daily observation records kept by staff
Using their AAC system
·fading prompts
By the annual review date, during structured activities, [Student] will use their communication system to comment or request with no adult prompting, as measured by a prompting-level data sheet kept during activities.
Grades PreK, K–2, 3-5, 6-8
Other ways to measure this
—a prompting-level data sheet kept during activities
—daily communication records
Sentence length in speech
·a running total
By the annual review date, when describing a picture or event, [Student] will speak in utterances averaging 6 words per utterance, as measured by language samples collected and analysed monthly.
Grades PreK, K–2
Other ways to measure this
—language samples collected and analysed monthly
—weekly structured description tasks recorded on a data sheet
Articulation carry-over in class
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, during classroom conversation, [Student] will produce their target sound correctly in words with 85% accuracy, as measured by classroom speech samples scored by staff.
Grades K–2, 3-5
Other ways to measure this
—classroom speech samples scored by staff
—weekly carry-over data sheets shared with the speech-language pathologist
Vocabulary for classroom needs
·opportunities met
By the annual review date, when [Student] needs help, a break or a material, they will say or show which one using their communication system in 8 of 10 opportunities, as measured by a communication tally kept by staff.
Grades PreK, K–2, 3-5
Other ways to measure this
—a communication tally kept by staff
—daily data sheets recording requests by type
Describing and explaining
·a running total
By the annual review date, when asked to describe an object, event or process, [Student] will give 5 relevant details in a logical order, as measured by weekly description tasks scored against a checklist.
Grades 3-5, 6-8
Other ways to measure this
—weekly description tasks scored against a checklist
—language samples reviewed monthly
Retelling an event
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, when asked what happened during an activity, [Student] will retell it in order including who, what and where, with 85% accuracy against a scoring guide, as measured by weekly retell tasks scored against a guide.
Grades K–2, 3-5
Other ways to measure this
—weekly retell tasks scored against a guide
—structured observation records
Conversational turn taking
·a running total
By the annual review date, in a conversation with a peer, [Student] will take 6 exchanges on the same topic, responding to what the peer said, as measured by turn counts recorded during structured social time.
Grades 3-5, 6-8, 9-12
Other ways to measure this
—turn counts recorded during structured social time
—weekly conversation samples scored by staff
Repairing a breakdown
·opportunities met
By the annual review date, when a listener does not understand, [Student] will repeat or rephrase the message rather than giving up, in 4 of 5 opportunities, as measured by observation records kept during conversation.
Grades 3-5, 6-8
Other ways to measure this
—observation records kept during conversation
—weekly communication data sheets
Speaking in front of the class
·opportunities met
By the annual review date, during class discussion, [Student] will contribute a relevant comment or question in 4 of 5 lessons, as measured by a participation tally kept during discussion.
Grades 3-5, 6-8, 9-12
Other ways to measure this
—a participation tally kept during discussion
—weekly observation records
Understanding wh- questions
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, when asked who, what, where, when and why questions about a familiar activity, [Student] will answer the question that was asked with 88% accuracy, as measured by weekly question probes scored with a key.
Grades PreK, K–2, 3-5
Other ways to measure this
—weekly question probes scored with a key
—structured language tasks recorded on a data sheet
Grammar in spoken language
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, in spoken sentences, [Student] will use the target grammatical form — plurals, past tense, or pronouns — correctly with 85% accuracy, as measured by language samples analysed for the target form.
Grades K–2, 3-5
Other ways to measure this
—language samples analysed for the target form
—weekly structured elicitation tasks recorded on a data sheet
Listening comprehension in class
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, after a spoken lesson segment, [Student] will answer questions about what was said with 85% accuracy, as measured by weekly listening comprehension checks scored with a key.
Grades 3-5, 6-8
Other ways to measure this
—weekly listening comprehension checks scored with a key
—lesson-embedded question sets recorded on a data sheet
Volume and rate
·opportunities met
By the annual review date, when speaking to a group, [Student] will use a volume and pace an audience at the back can follow, in 4 of 5 observed opportunities, as measured by observation records scored against a speaking checklist.
Grades 3-5, 6-8, 9-12
Other ways to measure this
—observation records scored against a speaking checklist
—recorded presentations reviewed by staff
Giving instructions to someone else
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, when asked to explain how to do something, [Student] will give the steps in order so a listener can follow them, scoring 85% against a step checklist, as measured by weekly explanation tasks scored against a checklist.
Grades 3-5, 6-8
Other ways to measure this
—weekly explanation tasks scored against a checklist
—structured observation records
Choosing a communication partner
·opportunities met
By the annual review date, when [Student] has something to share, they will get the listener’s attention before speaking in 8 of 10 opportunities, as measured by a communication tally kept by staff.
Grades K–2, 3-5
Other ways to measure this
—a communication tally kept by staff
—daily observation records
Understanding figurative and indirect language
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, when a speaker uses an idiom, a hint or sarcasm, [Student] will state what was actually meant with 80% accuracy, as measured by weekly scenario probes scored against a guide.
Grades 6-8, 9-12
Other ways to measure this
—weekly scenario probes scored against a guide
—structured social language tasks recorded on a data sheet
Presenting to a group
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, when giving a short prepared presentation, [Student] will cover all required content points, scoring 85% or higher on the class presentation rubric, as measured by the class presentation rubric applied by the teacher.
Grades 6-8, 9-12
Other ways to measure this
—the class presentation rubric applied by the teacher
—recorded presentations scored against the same rubric
Interview and workplace communication
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, in a practice interview or workplace exchange, [Student] will greet the person, answer questions in complete sentences and close the conversation, scoring 88% on a communication checklist, as measured by practice interviews scored against a checklist.
Grades 9-12, transition
Other ways to measure this
—practice interviews scored against a checklist
—job coach observation records
Communicating discomfort or pain
·opportunities met
By the annual review date, when [Student] feels unwell or uncomfortable, they will tell an adult using words, signs or their communication system in 4 of 5 observed opportunities, as measured by staff records of reported discomfort.
Grades PreK, K–2, 3-5, transition
Other ways to measure this
—staff records of reported discomfort
—daily communication data sheets
Generalising communication across settings
·opportunities met
By the annual review date, [Student] will use their target communication skill with at least two different adults and in at least two settings, in 4 of 5 observed opportunities, as measured by data sheets kept by staff in each setting.
Grades K–2, 3-5, 6-8
Other ways to measure this
—data sheets kept by staff in each setting
—weekly generalisation probes recorded across settings
Every figure on this page comes from one of the documents below, with the date it was read.
Requirements change; if a source has moved on since that date, the source is right and this
page is out of date.