Word meaning, context clues, morphology and academic vocabulary — written so what is counted is a behaviour, not an impression.
Write a vocabulary goal
Runs in your browser · nothing is sent anywhere · no student information
Annual goal
By the annual review date, when an unfamiliar word appears in sixth-grade-level text, [Student] will state a likely meaning and name the words in the sentence that support it, with 85% accuracy, as measured by weekly context-clue probes scored with a key.
Benchmarks
1
By the annual review date, when an unfamiliar word appears in sixth-grade-level text, [Student] will state a likely meaning and name the words in the sentence that support it, with 50% accuracy, as measured by weekly context-clue probes scored with a key.
2
By the annual review date, when an unfamiliar word appears in sixth-grade-level text, [Student] will state a likely meaning and name the words in the sentence that support it, with 60% accuracy, as measured by weekly context-clue probes scored with a key.
3
By the annual review date, when an unfamiliar word appears in sixth-grade-level text, [Student] will state a likely meaning and name the words in the sentence that support it, with 75% accuracy, as measured by weekly context-clue probes scored with a key.
Replace [Student] and any remaining bracket in your own document.
The IEP team writes the goal from this student's present levels; this is a starting draft,
not an IEP.
23
vocabulary goals
Each shown at an example present level and target.
Context clues
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, when an unfamiliar word appears in sixth-grade-level text, [Student] will state a likely meaning and name the words in the sentence that support it, with 85% accuracy, as measured by weekly context-clue probes scored with a key.
Grades 3-5, 6-8CCSS L.5.4
Other ways to measure this
—weekly context-clue probes scored with a key
—biweekly passage tasks recorded on a data sheet
Prefixes
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, when shown words carrying taught prefixes, [Student] will state how the prefix changes the meaning of the base word with 85% accuracy, as measured by weekly morphology probes.
Grades 3-5, 6-8CCSS L.4.4
Other ways to measure this
—weekly morphology probes
—biweekly affix tasks scored with a key
Suffixes and word forms
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, when given a base word, [Student] will produce the noun, verb and adjective forms and use one correctly in a sentence, with 80% accuracy, as measured by weekly word-form tasks scored with a key.
Grades 3-5, 6-8
Other ways to measure this
—weekly word-form tasks scored with a key
—biweekly written probes recorded on a data sheet
Greek and Latin roots
·a running total
By the annual review date, [Student] will state the meaning of 30 taught roots and give a word that contains each, as measured by a cumulative root inventory reviewed monthly.
Grades 6-8, 9-12CCSS L.7.4
Other ways to measure this
—a cumulative root inventory reviewed monthly
—weekly root probes recorded on a data sheet
Content-area vocabulary
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, when given key terms from a current ninth-grade-level science or social studies unit, [Student] will define each in their own words and use it in a sentence about the unit, with 85% accuracy, as measured by unit vocabulary assessments recorded on a data sheet.
Grades 6-8, 9-12
Other ways to measure this
—unit vocabulary assessments recorded on a data sheet
—weekly term checks scored with a key
Synonyms and antonyms
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, when given a third-grade-level word, [Student] will produce a synonym and an antonym for it with 85% accuracy across 10 words, as measured by weekly word relationship probes.
Grades K–2, 3-5CCSS L.3.5
Other ways to measure this
—weekly word relationship probes
—biweekly sorting tasks recorded on a data sheet
Multiple-meaning words
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, when a word with more than one meaning appears in sixth-grade-level text, [Student] will state which meaning the sentence calls for, with 85% accuracy, as measured by weekly homograph probes scored with a key.
Grades 3-5, 6-8
Other ways to measure this
—weekly homograph probes scored with a key
—biweekly passage tasks recorded on a data sheet
Using new words in speech
·opportunities met
By the annual review date, during class discussion, [Student] will use a target vocabulary word correctly in 4 of 5 observed opportunities, as measured by a discussion tally kept by the teacher.
Grades K–2, 3-5
Other ways to measure this
—a discussion tally kept by the teacher
—weekly observation records
Using new words in writing
·a running total
By the annual review date, in a written assignment, [Student] will use 5 target words used correctly from the current unit’s vocabulary list, as measured by written work scored against the unit word list.
Grades 3-5, 6-8, 9-12
Other ways to measure this
—written work scored against the unit word list
—biweekly writing samples recorded on a data sheet
Dictionary and glossary use
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, when given an unfamiliar word, [Student] will locate it in a print or digital dictionary and choose the entry that fits the sentence, with 85% accuracy, as measured by weekly reference tasks scored with a key.
Grades 3-5, 6-8CCSS L.4.4
Other ways to measure this
—weekly reference tasks scored with a key
—biweekly probes recorded on a data sheet
Categorizing words
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, when given picture or word cards, [Student] will sort them into named categories and say why each belongs, with 90% accuracy, as measured by weekly sorting tasks recorded on a data sheet.
Grades PreK, K–2
Other ways to measure this
—weekly sorting tasks recorded on a data sheet
—biweekly category probes scored with a key
Naming vocabulary
·a running total
By the annual review date, when shown common classroom and community pictures, [Student] will name 60 pictured items correctly, as measured by a picture naming inventory taken monthly.
Grades PreK, K–2
Other ways to measure this
—a picture naming inventory taken monthly
—weekly naming probes recorded on a data sheet
Academic verbs in directions
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, when a task uses an academic direction verb such as compare, summarize, justify or analyze, [Student] will state what the verb asks them to do before beginning, with 85% accuracy, as measured by weekly task-analysis checks scored with a key.
Grades 3-5, 6-8, 9-12
Other ways to measure this
—weekly task-analysis checks scored with a key
—assignment observations recorded on a data sheet
Word meaning from morphology
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, when shown an unfamiliar ninth-grade-level word built from a taught root and affix, [Student] will predict its meaning from its parts with 80% accuracy, as measured by weekly morphology probes scored with a key.
Grades 6-8, 9-12
Other ways to measure this
—weekly morphology probes scored with a key
—biweekly word-analysis tasks recorded on a data sheet
Idioms and expressions
·a running total
By the annual review date, [Student] will explain the meaning of 25 common idioms encountered in text or conversation, as measured by a cumulative idiom log reviewed monthly.
Grades 3-5, 6-8
Other ways to measure this
—a cumulative idiom log reviewed monthly
—weekly idiom probes recorded on a data sheet
Precise word choice
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, when revising their own writing, [Student] will replace vague words such as good, thing or stuff with a precise alternative, with 85% accuracy across marked instances, as measured by revision drafts compared against the original.
Grades 6-8, 9-12
Other ways to measure this
—revision drafts compared against the original
—weekly editing tasks scored with a checklist
Vocabulary self-monitoring
·opportunities met
By the annual review date, while reading assigned text, [Student] will flag words they do not know and look up or ask about them in 4 of 5 reading sessions, as measured by a student-kept word log reviewed weekly.
Grades 3-5, 6-8
Other ways to measure this
—a student-kept word log reviewed weekly
—observation records kept during reading
Positional and directional words
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, when given a direction containing a positional word such as behind, beside or between, [Student] will follow it correctly with 90% accuracy, as measured by weekly direction-following probes recorded on a data sheet.
Grades PreK, K–2
Other ways to measure this
—weekly direction-following probes recorded on a data sheet
—biweekly observation records
Vocabulary for self-advocacy
·opportunities met
By the annual review date, [Student] will name the accommodation they need using its actual name — extended time, audio text, a note-taking guide — in 4 of 5 observed opportunities, as measured by case manager check-in records.
Grades 6-8, 9-12
Other ways to measure this
—case manager check-in records
—observation records kept during class
Semantic mapping
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, when given a target word, [Student] will complete a word map with a definition, an example, a non-example and a related word, scoring 85% or higher against the map rubric, as measured by word maps scored weekly against a four-point rubric.
Grades 3-5, 6-8
Other ways to measure this
—word maps scored weekly against a four-point rubric
—biweekly vocabulary tasks recorded on a data sheet
Retention over time
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, when tested on vocabulary taught at least four weeks earlier, [Student] will define the words correctly with 80% accuracy, as measured by monthly cumulative vocabulary reviews.
Grades 3-5, 6-8, 9-12
Other ways to measure this
—monthly cumulative vocabulary reviews
—delayed post-tests recorded on a data sheet
Independent word learning
·fading prompts
By the annual review date, when [Student] meets an unfamiliar word in course reading, they will use a word-learning strategy — context, word parts, or a reference source — with no adult prompting, as measured by a prompting-level data sheet kept during class.
Grades 6-8, 9-12
Other ways to measure this
—a prompting-level data sheet kept during class
—weekly observation records noting prompts given
Vocabulary in math problems
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, when a word problem uses terms such as sum, difference, product, per or remaining, [Student] will state which operation the term signals with 88% accuracy, as measured by weekly math vocabulary probes scored with a key.
Every figure on this page comes from one of the documents below, with the date it was read.
Requirements change; if a source has moved on since that date, the source is right and this
page is out of date.