Sentence construction through multi-paragraph text, plus editing, handwriting and keyboarding. Rubric-scored goals say which rubric and which score.
Write a writing goal
Runs in your browser · nothing is sent anywhere · no student information
Annual goal
By the annual review date, when given a picture or prompt, [Student] will write a complete sentence with a subject, a verb, a capital letter and end punctuation, with 90% accuracy across five sentences, as measured by weekly writing samples scored against a sentence checklist.
Benchmarks
1
By the annual review date, when given a picture or prompt, [Student] will write a complete sentence with a subject, a verb, a capital letter and end punctuation, with 55% accuracy across five sentences, as measured by weekly writing samples scored against a sentence checklist.
2
By the annual review date, when given a picture or prompt, [Student] will write a complete sentence with a subject, a verb, a capital letter and end punctuation, with 65% accuracy across five sentences, as measured by weekly writing samples scored against a sentence checklist.
3
By the annual review date, when given a picture or prompt, [Student] will write a complete sentence with a subject, a verb, a capital letter and end punctuation, with 80% accuracy across five sentences, as measured by weekly writing samples scored against a sentence checklist.
Replace [Student] and any remaining bracket in your own document.
The IEP team writes the goal from this student's present levels; this is a starting draft,
not an IEP.
23
writing goals
Each shown at an example present level and target.
Complete sentences
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, when given a picture or prompt, [Student] will write a complete sentence with a subject, a verb, a capital letter and end punctuation, with 90% accuracy across five sentences, as measured by weekly writing samples scored against a sentence checklist.
Grades K–2, 3-5CCSS L.2.1
Other ways to measure this
—weekly writing samples scored against a sentence checklist
—biweekly writing probes recorded on a data sheet
Sentence expansion
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, when given a short sentence, [Student] will expand it by adding when, where or why detail while keeping it grammatical, with 85% accuracy, as measured by weekly sentence-expansion tasks scored with a key.
Grades 3-5, 6-8
Other ways to measure this
—weekly sentence-expansion tasks scored with a key
—writing samples reviewed biweekly
Written production
·rate over time
By the annual review date, when given a written prompt and ten minutes, [Student] will produce 80 words per ten minutes on topic, as measured by weekly timed writing probes scored for total words written.
Grades 3-5, 6-8
Other ways to measure this
—weekly timed writing probes scored for total words written
—biweekly curriculum-based writing measures
Paragraph structure
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, when writing a paragraph, [Student] will include a topic sentence, three supporting details and a closing sentence, with 90% of required elements present, as measured by paragraphs scored weekly against a four-element checklist.
Grades 3-5, 6-8CCSS W.4.2
Other ways to measure this
—paragraphs scored weekly against a four-element checklist
—biweekly writing samples recorded on a data sheet
Multi-paragraph essays
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, when assigned a ninth-grade-level essay, [Student] will produce an introduction, at least two body paragraphs with evidence, and a conclusion, scoring 85% or higher on the organization trait of the class rubric, as measured by the class writing rubric applied to the organization trait.
Grades 6-8, 9-12CCSS W.8.2
Other ways to measure this
—the class writing rubric applied to the organization trait
—monthly essay drafts scored against the same rubric
Planning before writing
·opportunities met
By the annual review date, before beginning a writing assignment, [Student] will complete a graphic organizer or outline and refer to it while drafting, in 4 of 5 assignments, as measured by submitted organizers checked against final drafts.
Grades 3-5, 6-8, 9-12
Other ways to measure this
—submitted organizers checked against final drafts
—weekly observation records kept by the teacher
Editing own work
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, using an editing checklist, [Student] will find and fix capitalization, punctuation and spelling errors in their own draft, correcting 80% of the errors present, as measured by drafts compared before and after editing.
Grades 3-5, 6-8CCSS W.5.5
Other ways to measure this
—drafts compared before and after editing
—weekly editing tasks scored against the checklist
Revising for meaning
·opportunities met
By the annual review date, after receiving feedback on a draft, [Student] will make at least three substantive revisions that change content rather than mechanics, in 4 of 5 assignments, as measured by draft comparisons kept by the teacher.
Grades 6-8, 9-12
Other ways to measure this
—draft comparisons kept by the teacher
—revision logs reviewed biweekly
Narrative writing
·a running total
By the annual review date, when writing a narrative, [Student] will include 5 story elements — character, setting, problem, events in order, and resolution — as measured by narratives scored against a story-element checklist.
Grades K–2, 3-5CCSS W.3.3
Other ways to measure this
—narratives scored against a story-element checklist
—biweekly writing samples recorded on a data sheet
Opinion and argument
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, when writing an opinion or argument piece, [Student] will state a position and support it with at least two reasons drawn from a source, scoring 85% or higher on the evidence trait of the class rubric, as measured by the class rubric applied to the evidence trait.
Grades 3-5, 6-8, 9-12CCSS W.6.1
Other ways to measure this
—the class rubric applied to the evidence trait
—monthly argument writing scored against the same rubric
Handwriting legibility
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, when writing a sentence by hand, [Student] will form letters with correct size, spacing and line placement, with 90% of letters legible to an unfamiliar reader, as measured by writing samples scored by a second staff member for legibility.
Grades PreK, K–2, 3-5
Other ways to measure this
—writing samples scored by a second staff member for legibility
—weekly handwriting probes recorded on a data sheet
Keyboarding
·rate over time
By the annual review date, when typing from a printed passage, [Student] will type at 25 words per minute with no more than three uncorrected errors, as measured by weekly timed typing probes.
Grades 3-5, 6-8, 9-12
Other ways to measure this
—weekly timed typing probes
—monthly keyboarding assessments recorded on a data sheet
Note-taking
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, during a ninth-grade-level lesson, [Student] will record the main points in a structured note format, capturing 80% of the points on the teacher’s key, as measured by notes compared against the teacher’s key.
Grades 6-8, 9-12
Other ways to measure this
—notes compared against the teacher’s key
—weekly note checks recorded on a data sheet
Summarizing in writing
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, after reading a sixth-grade-level passage, [Student] will write a three- to five-sentence summary in their own words, scoring 85% or higher on a summary checklist, as measured by summaries scored weekly against the checklist.
Grades 3-5, 6-8
Other ways to measure this
—summaries scored weekly against the checklist
—biweekly writing samples recorded on a data sheet
Answering constructed-response questions
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, when given a constructed-response question, [Student] will restate the question, answer it, and cite evidence, including all three parts with 85% accuracy, as measured by responses scored against a three-part checklist weekly.
Grades 3-5, 6-8, 9-12
Other ways to measure this
—responses scored against a three-part checklist weekly
—course assessments recorded on a data sheet
Getting started
·time on task
By the annual review date, when given a writing assignment, [Student] will begin writing within 3 minutes of the task being assigned, as measured by a latency record kept during writing tasks.
Grades 3-5, 6-8, 9-12
Other ways to measure this
—a latency record kept during writing tasks
—weekly observation records with a timer
Writing stamina
·time on task
By the annual review date, during a writing block, [Student] will write on topic for 20 minutes without redirection, as measured by a stamina log kept during writing blocks.
Grades 3-5, 6-8
Other ways to measure this
—a stamina log kept during writing blocks
—weekly observation records
Capitalization and punctuation
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, in a written paragraph, [Student] will use capital letters at sentence starts and for proper nouns and correct end punctuation with 90% accuracy, as measured by writing samples scored against a mechanics key.
Grades K–2, 3-5CCSS L.3.2
Other ways to measure this
—writing samples scored against a mechanics key
—weekly editing probes recorded on a data sheet
Transition words
·a running total
By the annual review date, in a multi-paragraph piece, [Student] will use 5 transition words used correctly to connect ideas, as measured by writing samples scored against a transition word list.
Grades 3-5, 6-8
Other ways to measure this
—writing samples scored against a transition word list
—biweekly drafts recorded on a data sheet
Writing with assistive technology
·fading prompts
By the annual review date, when completing a written assignment, [Student] will use their assigned writing support — speech-to-text, word prediction, or a graphic organizer — with no adult prompting, as measured by a prompting-level data sheet kept during writing tasks.
Grades 3-5, 6-8, 9-12
Other ways to measure this
—a prompting-level data sheet kept during writing tasks
—weekly observation records noting prompts given
Functional writing
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, when completing a functional writing task such as a message, form or short email, [Student] will include all required information and use appropriate tone, with 90% accuracy, as measured by completed forms and messages scored against a task checklist.
Grades 6-8, 9-12, transition
Other ways to measure this
—completed forms and messages scored against a task checklist
—weekly functional writing tasks recorded on a data sheet
Spelling in composition
·percent accuracy
By the annual review date, in a first draft, [Student] will spell grade-level high-frequency words correctly with 90% accuracy, as measured by first drafts scored against a high-frequency word list.
Grades 3-5, 6-8
Other ways to measure this
—first drafts scored against a high-frequency word list
—weekly writing samples recorded on a data sheet
Self-monitoring writing quality
·opportunities met
By the annual review date, before submitting written work, [Student] will score their own draft against the assignment rubric and name one thing to improve, in 4 of 5 assignments, as measured by self-scored rubrics collected with each assignment.
Grades 6-8, 9-12
Other ways to measure this
—self-scored rubrics collected with each assignment
Every figure on this page comes from one of the documents below, with the date it was read.
Requirements change; if a source has moved on since that date, the source is right and this
page is out of date.